666 The Anti Christ
Chapter IX: NEW WORLD ORDER
History of Freedom
History is teleological. It has a “ telos ” ……. an end, a purpose. It is not a collection of random events but is moving in a definite direction that can be discerned. Hegel identified the central axis of history – freedom. He said, “ The history of the world is none other than the progress of the consciousness of freedom.”
History comes to an end when absolute freedom has been attained. Absolute freedom is the condition where every person has the opportunity to express their maximum potential. If they fail, it is because of their own deficiencies, not because they have been sabotaged by others.
At the moment, the vast majority of us have no authentic freedom.
The system is set up to serve the interests of the Old World Order.
They are free …………. and the rest of us are deluding ourselves.
The OWOʼs genius is to give us the illusion of freedom, while withholding true freedom. History will not reach its telos until superficial freedom is replaced by genuine freedom.
We Are Not Free
Our contemporary illusory freedom is part of a long chain of history that has been analyzed in detail by Hegel. He shows us how we came to be where we are. He starts his study of historical teleology by examining the ancient civilizations of the Orient. In ancient China, India and Persia only one person was free ….. the ruler.
The will of all those who served the ruler was subordinated to that of their master. No one had a conscience in any modern sense, no one formed their own opinions about right and wrong.
All personal responsibility was absent from them. They simply obeyed.
In China, the people were like small children. Their emperor was their father.
In India, the caste system of Hinduism introduced another element.
As well as the despotism of the ruler, the people were subject to the inflexible despotism of religion. If you had a lowly station in life …. you couldn’t complain. It was just karmic retribution according to Hinduism, for misdemeanors in a previous existence. You had no right to demand freedom, and the thought didn’t even occur to you.
In Persia, the situation was different again. Once more, a despot reigned and religious rules applied ( this time Zoroastrian rather than Hindu ). However ….. whereas Hinduism was despotic – your nature was determined by a prior life of which you had no awareness – Zoroastrianism was about an ongoing struggle between good and evil in which everyone had a role to play.
The absolute ruler of Persia would never be challenged while he obeyed
Zoroastrianism, but if he acted against the religion then he risked being deposed.
In other words the ruler, like his subjects …… was constrained by principles.
He could not be capricious in the manner of the rulers of India and China.
Hegel saw the restraints placed on the ruler by principles ( intellectual or spiritual ) as providing the basis of ” true history “. If those principles could be changed, humanity might be transformed. Under the rule of a Chinese despot, there was no principle to which anyone could appeal to bring about change. In India, Hinduism was equated with nature itself and was also immune from change. These were static societies, where no realistic possibility of the introduction of freedom existed.
In Persia, the rule of law implied that new laws might one day be enacted that could lead to a better society.
In the west at this time, the city-states of ancient Greece were coming to prominence. These city-states were fiercely competitive and offered a much more individualistic vision of humanity. Power was much less centralized.
When the monolithic Persian Empire collided with the free city-states of Greece, the Greeks emerged victorious. The central reason for the success of the Greeks was that they fought more effectively …. with a greater sense of what was at stake. The Persian soldiers were like automatons. They knew that their ruler saw them all as utterly disposable. Their morale was much lower than that of the Greeks …. and they were far more likely to panic and flee.
But even the Greeks were not truly free. Sparta was a military state, with every citizen called into service. A huge population of Helot slaves served the Spartans.
In Athens, in name a democratic state, the vote was restricted to adult males who had completed military training. Women and foreigners had no vote and, as with Sparta, a large slave population served the state. Even the citizens themselves were far from free in a modern sense. They identified with the state to such an extent that its interests were theirs. They were more like cells in a body than free
agents with minds of their own.
Athens put Socrates to death because he dared to challenge the authority of the state and to ask the sort of awkward questions that modern dissenters routinely pose. Spartans who refused to serve the military ethos of their state were killed or banished in disgrace. The situation in contemporary America where many citizens actively loathe the federal government and even plot against it would have been incomprehensible to the Greeks. Every such dissenter would have been put to death.
Eventually, Greece succumbed to a despot ….. Philip II of Macedonia.
Philip’s son, the famous Alexander the Great, went on to conquer Persia, India and Egypt. ( Egypt, the nation of god-like pharaohs, was another empire where freedom was minimal. )
But a new empire – the Roman, soon eclipsed Alexander’s empire. Rome was like a cross between Sparta and Athens, a harsh military machine that still managed to acknowledge the rights of citizens. Again, a huge slave population served it.
Yet Rome was defeated in the end by a slave ideology … Christianity. The ethos of the empire changed under this new and strange religion that opposed all of the old pagan gods of Rome.
The Roman Empire was eventually resurrected in the guise of the Roman
Catholic Church ( religious power ) and the Holy Roman Empire ( political and military power ). The structure of the Catholic Church resembled that of the old Roman Empire, with the pope replacing the emperor and the cardinals the Senate.
Archbishops, bishops and priests were the equivalents of the officer ranks of the Roman army. It was a rigid hierarchy. The ordinary people, if they wanted God’s favor, had to go through the appropriate channels, from priest to pope. The pope was the ” vicar of Christ “, God’s representative on earth. The people themselves had no direct access to God. If they wanted to pray, they had to invoke a saint. The idea that an ordinary person could have a personal relationship with God …. was unthinkable.
Then Islam appeared. This religion had nothing resembling the hierarchy of
Catholicism. There was no pope, no voice of central authority. Every ordinary
Muslim could open a direct channel to Allah. All they needed was the Koran.
To that extent, they were freer than Catholics, though the history of Islam has not proved conducive to genuine freedom. ( Muslims are in such awe of their God that he takes the role of master and they of slaves. Slaves, by definition, are never free. Muslims – ‘ those who submit ‘ – revel in their own slavery. In terms of the dialectical progress of history, nothing is more certain than that Islam will have to be reformed or is doomed to a slow death because of its opposition to freedom. )
Eventually, the idea of a direct line to God spread to the Christian world.
Martin Luther opposed the Catholic hierarchy and increasingly viewed it as
an active obstacle to the true Christian message. The Protestant Reformation emphasized scripture over the authority of the Church. The Bible, previously only
available in Latin ( which ordinary people could not read ) was translated into German. Now everyone could study the Bible and draw their own conclusions.
There is only one Catholicism but there are now scores of Protestant sects. When people are free to make up their own minds, the tendency is always to the proliferation of factions. Gnosticism historically had many factions, each emphasizing a different aspects of Gnostic thinking. Islam has not splintered in the same way as Christianity because it is so simplistic that there is little scope for doctrinal dispute. Shia and Sunni Muslims differ over whether Mohammed’s descendants should have been accorded special status, not points of doctrine.
With the decentralization of power in the west and the release of the individual from the rigid hierarchy of Catholicism, freedom spread rapidly. Hegel regarded the Reformation as a decisive event in history, a huge breakthrough for the dialectical advance of freedom.
Science, in particular, was liberated from theology. Whereas the Catholic Church accused Galileo, one of the world’s greatest scientists, of heresy and suppressed his work, scientific thought started to flourish in free-thinking Protestant countries.
The Counter-Reformation, which brought the Jesuits to the fore, realized that Catholicism had to move with the times, and Catholicism also embraced science and the new thinking of the Enlightenment.
Islam became stuck in a rut because of overemphasis on the Koran and did not advance in terms of freedom, to this day is scientifically and culturally backward. In Europe, the Renaissance, Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and the Enlightenment led to an intellectual ferment that fueled increasing freedom
and started to switch the emphasis to the individual.
Nationalism and the slow disintegration of the Holy Roman Empire added fresh impetus. Then came the two critical events of the 18th Century ….. the American and French Revolutions. The Reformation had eroded the centralized power of Catholicism and now these two Revolutions had eroded the centralized power of monarchs.
Although Napoleon, a product of the French Revolution, chose to make himself an emperor, he also introduced codes of rights for citizens. These codes were derived from the thinking of the Revolution and influenced the whole of Europe, including Hegel’s nation Prussia, a militaristic monarchy.
In public, Hegel was content to proclaim that the Prussia of his time represented the culmination of history. Freedom of the individual had reached a sensible level, he said ….. tempered by the need for security, rightful authority and law and order. This kept him in good stead with the authorities, and ensured that he attracted no suspicion.
Privately, Hegel despised the Prussian state and longed for its overthrow and the implementation of true freedom. He believed that he could influence events more effectively if he appeared as a dutiful Prussian citizen …… while secretly working
behind the scenes against the Prussian monarchy.
Hegel’s analysis was adopted by Karl Marx, who now put forward class war based on economic inequality as the primary battleground of freedom. Rich people are much more free than poor people. Therefore to increase freedom wealth must be more evenly distributed. A communist state, according to Marx, was the final word in freedom since all private property was abolished, all wealth equally spread, and everyone had equal rights.
History has not supported Marx. The fall of the Berlin Wall brought an end to the Marxist dream. Communism did not deliver increased freedom. It was totalitarian, oppressive, bureaucratic, backward and reactionary.
At the end of the Cold War, American academic Francis Fukuyama declared that
western, liberal, capitalist democracy would be recognized as the end-point of
history’s pursuit of freedom. History had come to an end, he said.
The whole world would adopt the American and European system of government and economics …… he thought. He has been proved as wrong as Marx.
Hegel’s central thesis that history is about the increase in freedom of the ordinary citizen has proved correct. However …. it is obvious that we have not reached the end-point of freedom.
The mission of the Illuminati is to take humanity to that end-point.
The obstacles to freedom are everywhere. Monarchies still exist all across
the world. Repressive religions are still corrupting billions of people. There are dictators and tyrants. Power resides in the hands of rich elites that manipulate political and economic systems for their own ends. The super-rich are flourishing as never before. The Old World Order, a group of 6,000 people, run the planet.
The Illuminati’s agenda has never altered – to overthrow oppressive religions, governments and individuals who seek to control the people and hold back freedom.
What is ultimate freedom ? – when every person on earth gets an equal chance to maximize their potential. When those who rise higher than others do so on grounds of superior, demonstrable merit alone. What does that mean in practice ? No one can be allowed to be too rich or too poor. Failing families cannot be allowed to spiral ever downwards. Successful families cannot be allowed to buy additional advantages and privileges and turn themselves into powerful, self-perpetuating dynasties. The state must take a far more active role in people’s lives.
Right wing political parties such as the Republicans in America and the
Conservatives in Britain continually demand the minimization of state interference
in people’s lives. These parties are the tools of the Old World Order. They want rich,
elite, dynastic families to rule the world in perpetuity, and for the state to keep out
of their clandestine business. When you hear anyone calling for a reduction in the power of the state, you know that you are listening to a mouthpiece of the OWO.
The Jewish philosopher Isaiah Berlin in his essay ” Two Concepts of Liberty ”
(1958) highlighted the difference between the Old World Order’s approach to freedom and that of the New World Order. Isaiah Berlin was a Zionist and close friend of the Rothschild family. He loved to move in the circles of the wealthy and powerful, a typical hanger-on of the Old World Order, an advocate of their ideology.
Berlin distinguished between ” negative ” and ” positive ” liberty.
Negative liberty is the position that people should be left to themselves, and the state should impose the minimum number of constraints. This type of freedom is not for anything, rather it is concerned with being free from interference. American Republicans trumpet the value of negative liberty.
The state is kept passive in relation to the people. Some people – the rich, powerful and well-connected – flourish while the rest, the vast majority, live bland, banal lives or, in the case of a large underclass, lives of grim, grinding poverty and despair.
The state extends no helping hand. American capitalist democracy is the creed
of negative liberty. Many American citizens live in squalor, with minimal access to basic standards of health care. Tens of millions of Americans are dirt poor, with no prospects. They are sustained by the illusion of the ” American Dream “, which, in reality, is as rare as a lottery win. One in a million defy the odds and succeed.
For many of the rest, the dream is a nightmare.
Positive liberty is where the state is highly interventionist and offers the people
a grand vision, a collective project in which everyone can participate. It promises them identity and self-realization, a release from the directionless, purposeless lives that overtake most people when they are left to their own devices. Positive liberty is for something. It is about becoming something new. From this type of liberty a new humanity will emerge, stronger, fitter, more intelligent, capable of greatness. Ordinary people will be able to get in touch with their Higher Selves, to unleash the latent powers within them that negative liberty seeks to inhibit.
Positive liberty is a progressive and active conception of liberty. It is about changing the world for the better.
Cynicism, apathy, nihilism, and social fragmentation are the fruits of negative liberty. Our horizons are narrow and limited. Junk proliferates. People become zombie consumers, perpetually stuck in a vast, 24/7 shopping mall. They shop for the latest cheap trinkets with which the rich have tempted them. They worship celebrities because their own lives are so lacking. They are always dreaming of a better life, but doing nothing to make it happen.
They don’t have the tools or resources to make a difference.
Celebrities become ” brands “. People are reduced to ” brand followers “. Even dead celebrities like Michael Jackson are brands. What kind of world is it where advertising brands shape the world ? You mustn’t be seen with the wrong brand, you must pay a fortune for the right brand.
Apathy is endemic in societies based on negative liberty, selfishness is maximized. ” I’m all right, Jack. ” ” I’m looking after Number 1.” Screw everyone else. There’s no
community. People are alienated and estranged. They live in ” bad faith “.
They have an ” unhappy consciousness.” Yet our leaders tell us that we’ve never had it so good. They have never had it so good, but the rest of us inhabit a Waste Land where there are no values.
Political correctness is our new morality. In a world of political correctness, everyone is permanently on the verge of apologizing for fear that they might be about to inadvertently offend someone. To cause offense, any kind of offense, is the greatest of crimes these days. What sort of people are we when we feel compelled to apologize for what we know to be true ? Do we no longer have any convictions ? Do we stand for nothing ? Is appearing nice, and being acceptable to our peers, what we have been reduced to ?
Don’t listen to the Rothschilds. Don’t listen to Isaiah Berlin. Don’t listen to the Old World Order. Negative liberty is a trap. It leads to our present-day wilderness, to a global shopping mall full of zombies, listening to piped-in muzak and searching for the right brands to boost their self-esteem.
Negative liberty provides a global stage for reality TV, a global sports fields for preening, prancing show ponies. Some soccer players are now signing contracts worth £250,000 per week – £12.5 million a year – £60 million for a 5-year contract.
Fight back. Don’t watch these people. Shun them. Don’t buy brands. Don’t watch reality TV. Don’t buy into all of the Old World Order’s scams and tricks. Resist the tyrants. Theirs is a project for reducing us to subhumans; consumers on a conveyor belt, our only purpose to buy the latest gadgets, labels and designer items to line the pockets of the super-rich. We are the society of suckers, the stooges and the patsies. They saw us coming a long time ago.
There’s a sucker born every minute, and each of us was one of them.
But our fate is not set in stone. We can find our dignity again. We can become people rather than consumers. We must turn to positive liberty.
We are told by our masters to defend freedom and democracy. What they mean is negative freedom and dumbocracy …… Is that what you want to fight and die for ?
Ours is a democracy of obedience and compliance. In every country, we get the Siamese twins of Republicans and Democrats, Conservative and Labour, and so on. We are only one step removed from Henry Ford’s version of choice – ” You can have any colour so long as it’s black.”
In the 2004 American election, Americans were offered a choice between two rich, privileged members of Skull and Bones. Did it matter which candidate won ? That was no choice at all. We never have a choice. We always get the candidates of the Old World Order.
No one is burned at the stake for heresy in our society. Instead, anyone who dares to reject the Old World Order is mocked and marginalized in the media. Political correctness, another ingenious device of the Old World Order, instantly shuts down
any form of controversial debate.
Criticize the Jewish bankers of Wall Street and you will immediately be branded anti-Semitic. You might as well be branded with the Mark of Cain. No one needs stakes, nooses and torture chambers anymore. We engage in self-censorship. Why ? To stop us from speaking out against the OWO. To stop us telling the truth.
The world has lost its nerve. It has become weak and feeble, full of ” last men “, those who wish only to satisfy their petty needs, to be left alone to get on with their small, trivial pleasures.
It’s true that positive liberty can go wrong. The communism of the old Soviet Union was the last major attempt to implement a whole new conception of society. It failed because it was an atheistic, slave morality that emphasized equality over merit.
The Illuminati have often been accused of crypto-communism, but we loathe
communism as much as we do capitalism. We are advocates of competition.
We praise ambition. We admire and encourage great accomplishments.
We want to reward and celebrate the individuals who do outstanding things. We want innovators and geniuses. We want great people. But all within reason.
In a meritocratic society, the desire for more than the average is admirable, providing you are willing to work harder than the average. But the desire for excessive reward, out of all proportion to the actual work you have put in, is not meritocratic. There are only 24 hours in a day. If one person works hard for one hour a day and another for ten hours a day, then, on the most basic view, he deserves ten times more. He doesn’t warrant a million times more as we often see in our contemporary capitalist society.
In a meritocracy, there are no ” masters of the universe.”
There are no astronomical rewards. Instead, there is the sort of glory for high achievement that the ancient Greeks understood, to wear a winner’s laurel wreath, to receive the adulation of the crowd, and to be given a reasonable monetary bonus as a reward for excellence, is that not enough ? Why must some people, overcome by greed, be allowed to demand all the riches of earth for their meagre achievements ?
They should remember the tale of King Midas. When everything you touch turns to gold, you are doomed. And you deserve to perish. Greed is not good. It is a crime.
A world of the free
Existence is fundamentally teleological. Its purpose is to locate its hidden maximum, the transcendent point where it reaches its fullest expression. There, existence as an impersonal abstraction transfers power to a personal, concrete self-consciousness. That self-consciousness is the fruition of the universe’s search for its own soul. It is what we call God.
Once God has evolved, the universe’s original telos has been satisfied. It is then God who sets a new telos. He is free to choose anything. He has the knowledge and power to accomplish whatever he desires.
The universe is not impersonal. It is not meaningless. It is not lifeless and barren. It
creates meaning. It creates intelligence. It creates consciousness. It creates a soul.
It becomes alive. It becomes a person. God is the universe as a living entity.
The Hylocosmos is God’s body and the Psychocosmos his mind.
The universe’s original purpose was to become self-conscious and, from then, to intelligently direct its own future and attain absolute freedom and knowledge.
( Absolute knowledge, Hegel says, is ” mind knowing itself as mind.” ) The earth became self-conscious in the shape of humanity and now it has an intelligence to direct it. The universe is earth writ large.
Each cell in a human body busies itself with basic, microscopic functions, yet all those cells put together can create a Hegel, Einstein or Da Vinci. The cells treated individually and the cells treated as a whole are two entirely different things. As the human personality is to individual cells so is God to the universe.
It can be said that the purpose of cells in a human body is to provide the platform for human intelligence. Equally, the purpose of the components of the universe is to provide the platform for a universal intelligence. As above, so below. That is the ancient wisdom. We need only examine ourselves to see how the universe works.
The wise will see that the reductive, scientific prescription of purposeless evolution by natural selection actually masks a more fundamental principle of the universe striving towards its telos in a process that is superficially blind but is anything but.
Teleology does not contradict natural selection. Rather, natural selection is the primary tool of teleology, the mechanism it employs to find its way to its destination.
Many scientists, because they can’t directly observe purpose, declare that it is not there, but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. These scientists erroneously, and contrary to the principles of the scientific method, conclude that purpose is permanently ruled out.
Scientific method recognizes that no scientific theory is ever definitively proved. Each theory is only a provisional truth that can be overturned at any time if new evidence appears that refutes the theory. Science does not reach completion. Confidence in the findings of science increases each time experiment confirms theory, but 100% confidence is never, and can never be, attained.
Conventional religion makes humanity subordinate itself to God. It legitimizes the principle that a remote, mysterious authority should control us. This principle then reveals itself in every aspect of our lives. When we are children, our parents who seem like gods to us control us. Then, at school, teachers control us. Then, in the workplace, by managers and bosses. In our religious lives, to priests, preachers and popes. In our financial lives, by the ” masters of the universe ” in Wall Street
and the City. In our leisure time, celebrities, ” stars “, ” heroes ” control us.
We want to be like them, to wear what they wear, do what they do.
We have negated ourselves. We have become nothing.
We have surrendered the control of our lives to others.
Those who control us are the Old World Order. They think we deserve to be treated like cattle. After all, we meekly go along with our fate. We have not fought back. Like the Muslims, we submit. We should have ” submission ” branded on our foreheads. Why do we submit ? Because we are weak and they are strong.
There are many more of us, but they use the principle of ” divide and rule ” to control us. We can never agree amongst ourselves. And that’s exactly what they want. That’s why just 6,000 people can rule the world.
How can they be stopped ?
We are raised to be cannon fodder. The masters are raised entirely differently. They are brought up to rule, and we are brought up to serve them. They have infinite ambition and the widest horizons. We settle for minimum wage jobs and dreary office work.
In a world of strong, resourceful humans who take control of their own lives, the power of the OWO would be shattered. The masters of the universe would vanish, as would the religious leaders, the authority figures, the managers, the bosses, the celebrities, the stars and heroes. We must be our own heroes, manage ourselves, control our own destinies. But that requires personal strength, energy and talent.
Those are the qualities that must be inculcated in every person. Imagine what billions of talented people could accomplish. Humanity could reach for the stars.
We could unleash our maximum potential, live our lives to the fullest extent.
We should shape our lives like the most expert of sculptors, fashioning the clay with our own personal genius. Instead, we go along with the schemes of the OWO. They don’t want us to be strong. They don’t want to help us. They have got the world they want. They want us to obey and cause them no trouble. They let us do whatever we like, provided we don’t challenge them. But only they lead truly free lives.
The rest of us must endure the yoke of the Old World Order.
You would think we would have tired of it by now.
One of the most controversial members of the Illuminati was Saint-Just, one of the architects of the French Revolution. He came to power at just 25 and was guillotined by the age of 26.
Saint-Just’s policy left many members of the Illuminati uncomfortable. His hatred of the Old World Order was so extreme that he demanded their complete annihilation.
At the trial of King Louis XVI, Saint-Just gave his maiden speech to the French revolutionary Convention. It was a dazzling speech that has gone down as a landmark in history. Under a monarchy, this young genius would never have had
an opportunity to display his exceptional merit. To contrast his speech with those
of contemporary politicians is to see how pathetic and talentless our politicians are. Not one is fit to stand in the same company as Saint-Just.
Here are two short extracts from his dramatic speech of 13 November 1792.
” Some day men will be astonished that in the eighteenth century humanity was less advanced than in the time of Caesar. Then, a tyrant was slain in the midst of the Senate, with no formality but thirty dagger blows, with no law but the liberty of Rome. And today, respectfully, we conduct a trial for a man who was the assassin of a people, taken in flagrante, his hand soaked with blood, his hand plunged in crime.”
” With whatever illusions, whatever conventions, monarchy cloaks itself, it remains an eternal crime against which every man has the right to rise and to arm himself. Monarchy is an outrage which even the blindness of an entire people cannot justify, that people, by the example it gave, is guilty before nature, and all men hold from nature the secret mission to destroy such domination wherever it may be found. No man can reign innocently. The folly is all too evident. Every king is
a rebel and an usurper. Do kings themselves treat otherwise those who seek to usurp their authority ? Was not Cromwell’s memory brought to trial ? And certainly Cromwell was no more usurper than Charles I, for when a people is so weak as to yield to the tyrant’s yoke, domination is the right of the first comer, and is no more sacred or legitimate for one than for any other. Those are the considerations which a great and republican people ought not to forget when judging a king.”
In the vote in January 1793 to determine the king’s fate,
Saint-Just gave one of the briefest verdicts … ” Because Louis XVI was the enemy of the people, of its liberty and its happiness, i conclude for death.”
Saint-Just and Robespierre, two great Illuminists, were guillotined in July 1794. They were brought down by the machinations of Satanic archons who saw that the French Revolution might be exported to every nation and permanently destroy the power-base of the Old World Order.
Where are the Saint-Justs of today ? Our world can no longer create people like that. We are zombies, suckers, brainless consumers, shuffling our way towards oblivion. History will never mark our passing. We are the damned. The Old World Order have nothing to fear from us.
Yet teleology is on our side. From somewhere, through some mechanism, people will come to prominence who will dare to take on the power of the Old World Order. It is an inevitable outcome of the arrow of history. Freedom cannot be stopped.
Are you a freedom fighter ? What are you going to do to help change the world ?
In 1948, George Orwell wrote his greatest book …. Nineteen Eighty Four.
Our “ liberal ” western democracy claims that it has prevented Orwellʼs chilling vision coming to pass. In fact, it has succeeded in producing something worse. OʼBrien himself would have been proud of what our society has “ achieved ”.
Here is why ………
1984 Through the Looking Glass
Remember Room 101 ? it contains the worst thing in the world and i invented it myself. Maybe my finest piece of work. Yesterday we had Winston Smith in there. He was terrified of rats ….. such a prole.
Winston Smith ….. a sniveling individual if ever there was one. And to think he imagined that i, O’Brien, of the highest echelon of the Party, might enter into an alliance with him.
Today i have decided to subject myself to an experiment.
I will go into Room 101, this time to be on the receiving end. i already know what the worst thing in the world is for me ….. the society advocated by Winston Smith.
In i go, into a plain room with whitewashed walls. In a moment, the Incubus Drug, a gas that penetrates to the darkest corners of my mind where my profoundest terrors lurk – will be introduced into the air. It will gather my fears, intensify them, and bring them to life.
Here comes the gas. Already, i can visualize Winston Smith, smiling slyly at me. He will be my tour guide …. just as Virgil was for Dante in The Inferno, i feel sick.
The horror begins. We’re standing in a carriage of a train that travels underground. We’re both wearing pinstriped suits and carrying leather attaché cases. A crowd of similarly attired men is jostling us. i cannot breathe. i feel a panic attack coming on.
Mercifully, we get off the train before i faint. We push through a throng, trudge up a broken-down escalator and emerge into a crowded street near St Paul’s Cathedral.
We enter a large glass building and sit down in an open-plan office full of ……. i can only describe them as human automatons. They’re worse than the proles.
Tele-screens display endless arrays of numbers. Telephones ring incessantly. Machines bleep. The automatons shout and scream. They seem to do nothing
but buy and sell, but only in a virtual sense .. no actual goods ever materialize. These automatons don’t do a single creative thing …. just like our own proles.
All the while, Smith smiles at me ….. that same sly grin.
This nightmare continues for ten hours, and i thought we were cruel. Now i am slowly beginning to respect Winston Smith and his kind.
We leave the building and again we descend into the crowded underground and perform our earlier journey in reverse …. i imagine this is how a trip to Hell begins.
We exit at a mainline railway station and board a train. Again, i am jostled, forced to stand in stifling heat amongst a sweating, smelly horde who talk unceasingly about property prices and retail therapy ( whatever that is ) …. i am breathless once more.
Winston is reading a newspaper. A cursory glance reveals that its authors would surely rise straight to the top of the Ministry of Truth. Every article is a Two Minute Hate, not directed against an enemy power but some hapless individual or other.
Everything they have printed is clearly false. In my society, the past is falsified to make it consistent with the present but in Winston’s society, the present is falsified merely to provide entertainment.
I notice that many women are reading magazines that could easily have been produced by our Pornosec, while others have their faces buried in novels that, as i realized after peering at one that had been discarded, may well have been created by our novel-writing machines.
At last we escape from the train. Winston is still smiling. All around us are posters, but they don’t proclaim the merits of Big Brother. Instead, they are announcing the alleged indispensability of soap powders and automobiles and a host of baubles and beads serving no purpose whatever ……. What is wrong with these people ?
We reach a small terraced house that apparently costs a million pounds even though you can’t swing a cat in it, and Winston invites me in. He switches on a telescreen and I watch a program about the Thought Police. In Winston’s society, they are known by the brilliant name of the Politically Correct, i wish i had thought of that. They gibber in a language almost identical to Newspeak. They terrify even me. Some of them would appear to be members of the senior Anti-Sex League.
Next, a grey man appears and Winston tells me that this is the Prime Minister.
i take notes as i have never encountered such a fine exponent of double think.
i have to force myself to think that way …. but it appears to come naturally to the leaders of Winston’s society ….. the members of the Capitalist Democracy Party. This party is divided into three factions called Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat. i am unable to identify any way in which these factions differ. For all intents and purposes …… this is a totalitarian regime.
The slogans of my Party are …. War is Peace …. Slavery is Freedom …. Ignorance is Strength. The slogans of Winston’s Party appear to be ….
Ignorance is Freedom …. Stupidity is Strength …. Inequality is Equality ….. Hypocrisy is Justice ….. Delusion is Truth. What an excellent set of slogans.
Winston’s society has many Emmanuel Goldsteins. The people are expected to throw as much abuse at them as they can muster. The Enemy of the People now goes under various names, Osama bin Laden, the President of Iran, the President of North Korea etc. One such Enemy of the People was called Saddam Hussein.
They went to war with him over Weapons of Mass Destruction, which he told them he didn’t have, and, indeed, he didn’t. But they, the proven liars, relentlessly called him a liar. How wonderful. A few years ago, one of the Goldsteins was called Gerry Adams and, in an attempt to mock him, they refused to broadcast his voice. Actors were allowed to do an impression of him and say precisely what he had just said. How bizarre is that ? ….. i really am learning valuable lessons here.
Just as Oceania is always at war, so are Winston’s nation and its allies.
They call it the War on Terror. Marvelous. It is the perfect means to keep all of the citizens on a permanent war footing ( all sorts of civil liberties can be swept away ) and in a perpetual state of fear from which only the Government can save them. Why didn’t Big Brother think of that ?
Next, i see a telescreen program about the unemployed. These are unpersons in Winston’s society. It would be easy to find work for them all simply by reducing the number of hours worked by others. But the workers in Winston’s society refused to consent to this because they prefer that others should be redundant than that their own pay packets should be diminished. It brings a lump to my throat.
As i watch more programs, i discover so many amazing facts about Winston’s society. There are more surveillance cameras than people. Even we have not managed that. Diaries are freely available in Winston’s society, but none of the citizens can write, and they are all so brainwashed by consumerism that they do not have any subversive thoughts to express anyway.
There are no dissidents in Winston’s society ……. there are only shoppers.
Winston’s society has people called ‘ Spin Doctors ‘ who are the equivalent of our senior officials in the Ministry of Truth. Not one word of truth ever passes their lips.
Yesterday, i told Winston that the Party required him to acknowledge that two plus two is five and i had to torture him to make him see sense. Here they agree without hesitation, i think that is probably because they can’t count.
The leaders of Winston’s society don’t need to control the past or rewrite history – they just need to provide things for people to buy. The people know nothing about the past, and don’t care. A ” glamour model ” was asked if Winston Churchill was a Prime Minister, a President, a King or a Rapper. She answered that he was the first black President of America. A ‘ supermodel ‘ mistook the leader of the Conservative Party for a plumber ( better not let Big Brother hear about that ). All of our elaborate tactics never produced results as effective as these ….. complete ignorance of all things that have ever happened. We must copy the non-education system of this
society. Sorry …… i meant the education system.
It wouldn’t matter if all the clocks struck 13 in Winston’s society because time has become irrelevant, and the citizens themselves are irrelevant. They’re lower than the proles.
The gas wears off and i am back in Room 101. Well, what a turn up for the books. Far from being Hell, Winston’s society is a very Heaven, the realization of all of Big Brother’s principles. I shall have to seek out Winston at the Chestnut Tree bar and shake his hand. He was right all along and will be welcomed into the Inner Party immediately. We shall implement his Capitalist Democracy without delay. It turns people into morons, and they aren’t even bothered …. as long as they can shop.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a human with a dollar sign stamped on his face and pushing a shopping trolley ……. for eternity.
This is how our modern society reflects Big Brotherʼs totalitarianism …….
Big Brother …. Capitalist Liberal Democracy. ( No mechanisms exist, in any practical sense, to replace this form of government. It is therefore totalitarian. )
Inner Party …. the Upper Class / Super rich. ( The state is designed to meet their needs. )
Outer Party …. the Middle Class.
( They aspire to rise to the Inner Party. Are terrified of being relegated to proles. )
Proles …. the Working Class.
( They aspire to rise to the Outer Party. Terrified of being relegated to unpersons. They spend all of their leisure time trying to shut out the appalling lives they lead. Heavy users of alcohol, cigarettes and drugs. Excessive TV watchers, particularly of chat shows, soap operas, hospital and forensic dramas, detective shows etc ).
Unpersons …. the Under Class.
( The state is reluctant to acknowledge their existence. )
Doublethink …. People are so ignorant that not even in principle would they be able to understand that they are holding hosts of contradictory opinions. Orwell’s warning about doublethink has been realized in every way in our present society.
Big Brother is watching you …. CCTV cameras, GCHQ, MI5, MI6, Special Branch. Newspeak …. political correctness. ( To “ narrow the range of thought ”. ) Emmanuel Goldstein – any enemy identified by the Government or tabloid papers.
Pornosec …. Tabloid newspapers.
Two Minutes Hate …. Front pages of tabloid newspapers.
Party Slogans …. the outpourings of Spin Doctors.
Ministry of Truth …. Spin Doctors / Tabloid newspapers.
Ministry of Love …… MI5 / MI6 / Special Branch / CO19 / Police. The police have killed more innocent people than the Islamists.
Ministry of Plenty …. Shops, particularly supermarkets, especially Tesco. Give the people plenty of what they do not need.
Ministry of Peace … Ministry of Defence that continually engages in offensive wars.
Winstonʼs Diary …. all free thinkers are labelled “ mad ” And are relentlessly mocked by the tabloid newspapers.
Oceaniaʼs perpetual war …. the War on Terror.
Goldsteinʼs Book …. “ free speech ” and the possibility of producing new political movements ( but in practice neither is there any free speech nor hope of overthrowing the tyranny called Capitalist Liberal Democracy ).
Fiction Department …. Tabloid newspapers, Government League Tables, Official Government statistics.
In 1984, the Party maintains power by keeping its citizens ignorant. Capitalist Liberal Democracy does exactly the same thing. It provides the hopeless State education system so that the privately educated Inner Party members can keep indefinite control.
In 1984, a huge effort goes into controlling the past, present and future.
( to serve the Partyʼs interests ). Capitalist Liberal Democracy erases the past by avoiding teaching history in a meaningful way. It controls the future by placing its citizens in debt ( Mortgages / Credit Cards ). The proles had no chance in 1984, and they have no chance now.
What are the discernible objects of Capitalist Liberal Democracy ?
1) To maintain the Inner Party in their positions of wealth and power.
2) To generate hordes of compliant consumers who love to shop till they drop. Thus sustaining the wealth of the capitalists ( who own the goods being sold ). ” i shop therefore i am.”
3) To promote consumerism as the greatest good. The people are relegated to mere units of consumption. Your value in society is directly proportional to how much you can afford to consume.
4) To prevent anyone from becoming too intelligent.
( The Cassius Principle ….. He thinks too much. Such men are dangerous. )
5) To reject philosophy, science, history and indeed all academic knowledge. Except as far as it supports consumerism and the production of consumer goods.
6) To keep the people permanently stupid / distracted / in a stupor / apprehensive. via dumbed down TV, cigarettes, alcohol, Tabloid newspapers, Hollywood movies, junk food, shops full of ” desirable ” crap, texting, web surfing, social networking, personal debt, mortgages, credit cards, the War on Terror.
Down with Big Brother, down with Capitalist Liberal Democracy. There is only one way out of this disaster ………… Meritocracy.
The Old World Order’s plan is not mysterious or strange.
It is the simplest one imaginable, and it is tacitly supported by many people who claim to oppose the Old World Order. It is this ……. how do i ensure that my family is more successful than other families ? As soon as you let that thought enter your head you are damned and the game is over.
This is the gospel of the Old World Order, their morality, their path to ” salvation.” The issue could not be simpler. If you have the ability to place your family above more talented families, what will you do ? Will you make the most of the advantage, or will you refrain ? Will you sacrifice the interests of your family to those of more talented strangers, or will you do everything in your power to give your family an advantage over those strangers ? Do not call yourself a meritocrat if you think the untalented members of your family deserve to prosper more than the talented members of other families.
The remarkably untalented Bush family has dominated American political life because it is the ultimate manifestation of the desire of the American family to glorify itself no matter that it lacks any trace of merit.
But are not all families like that ? That is what the Old World Order relies on.
It succeeds because it is the ordinary family writ large. All typical families would do
the same in their position. They would use their wealth and power to rig the system
in favor of the members of their family.
They do not care about the objective merits of their family …. or of other families.
If you are a genuine meritocrat, you would support the most meritorious person over a close member of your own family. Who would actually do that in practice ?
There can be a fair world only if there is a willingness to acknowledge the superior merit of other families. That is the greatest challenge to humanity. It is also the only way for any family to get true justice. If you do not believe in merit then you will be ruled by rich and privileged families such as the Bush family for ever. They have used their advantages to the maximum … and your children have paid the price. And in that case …… you do not deserve any better.
A Fair Race ?
You’re the fastest runner in the world and you take your place at the starting line for the most important race of your life. You look up the track and see some obese guy in a suit standing five meters from the finishing tape.
You complain to the race organizer but he tells you to mind your own business and concentrate on your own race. You think it must be some bizarre joke and it will all get sorted out later. The starting pistol sounds and you set off, running faster than you ever have in your life.
But no matter how fast you run, no matter how good you are, you will never beat that fat bloke who is huffing, puffing and waddling his way towards the finish line.
Fatso wins the gold medal, and receives the adulation of the crowd. Two attractive blondes throw themselves at him. Everyone tells him how brilliant he is. He says he owes everything to God and his loving family who bought him a place at the best of schools and paid a million dollars to allow him to start five meters from the finishing line. The crowd cheers and demands that the winner’s parents be allowed to stand on the podium alongside their brilliant son. A reporter asks father, mother and son what they think of the second-placed athlete who broke the world record but still lost. They shrug and say in unison ‘” he’s not a member of our family, who cares.”
The crowd, full of like-minded families, rises to acclaim them. ” If only we could all be like them,” they sigh. The world-record holder goes back to his housing project and dead end job. His colleagues tell him he’s a loser, and turn their backs on him.
Welcome to the anti-meritocratic world, this world. What are you going to do about
it ? Will you stand back and watch while cronyism, nepotism, the old school tie, the private club, the right university, the right accent, the right background, the right secret society, the right religion, the right family, destroy merit so that their chosen ones can prosper at your expense ? It is time to smash the conspiracy. Break up all the mechanisms that allow privileged groups within society to rig the system in their favor and penalize anyone who doesn’t belong to their insidious cliques.
Meritocracy seeks to ensure that everyone, as far as possible, starts the race of life from the same starting position. Then we will see who the fastest runners really are, who deserve the medals, who should justly receive the acclaim and the rewards. At the moment, who you know ( nepotism and cronyism ) is vastly more important than what you know ( merit ).
How often do we hear the mantra … ” Networking is the fastest way up the ladder.” Meritocracy will push this toxic ladder over. From now on, demonstrable talent, not your social connections ….. will be the fastest way to make progress in life.
The Wealth Census
20% of the world are Muslims.
Does anyone ever say that a powerful cabal of Muslims runs the world ? Never.
The Jews represent about 0.3% of the world’s population and yet many people are convinced that some kind of Jewish cabal takes a leading role in world affairs. This belief has been persistent for hundreds of years. Without any question, many of the world’s richest individuals are Jewish. The interests of Israel are given astonishing priority by the world’s single superpower, the USA, even though, politically, it would be far more sensible for America to cultivate a friendly relationship with the Islamic world. America does the opposite ……. Why ?
The Jews are a clever people, but the Dutch are every bit as clever, and they also form about 0.3% of the world’s population. No one ever claims that a Dutch cabal is running the world. In fact the very idea seems preposterous. But no one thinks it is ridiculous that an elite group of Jews is at the top table of those running the world.
Is there not a prima facie case to be answered here ? Wall Street, Hollywood, the TV world, the Academic World, the world of Literature, the Legal World, Medicine, Science, the White House …… are all said to be under a strong Jewish influence.
Money, in our world, equals power. Many Jews are very rich and they use their wealth to further the interests of Jews around the world, and they do everything they can to aid the Zionist state of Israel. They are obsessed with promoting the
interests of the Jewish family …… the Chosen People.
Those who say anything negative about anything to do with Jews are immediately branded anti-Semitic and they are then treated as pariahs, shunned by all civilized people, excluded from public affairs …… and given no media exposure.
The machine to promote Zionist interests has been refined over many generations and is now virtually perfect. No one is ever allowed to criticize it, no one is allowed to probe and expose it. All debate regarding it is immediately shut down …. except on the internet where just about everyone is talking about it.
Why such a difference between the internet world and official media outlets ? Powerful Jewish moguls control most of the mainstream media …. obviously.
The richest people in the world must be compelled by the ordinary people of the world to reveal, as part of an annual census of the rich, their religious affiliations, which schools and colleges they attended, which societies they belong to, which political parties they support and which financial donations they have made to which organizations, and to reveal any ” offshore ” accounts they have.
Do the ordinary people not have the absolute right to know who is controlling their lives ? Let’s get it all out in the open once and for all. And to all those who object to such a compulsory census of the top 1% of the wealthy of every country …… what have you got to hide? It is time for the people to know the truth.
The Annual Wealth Census or the Annual Rich List Disclosure Act should be an integral part of any ” democracy “. Secrecy among the privileged elite is always to the detriment of the people. ‘Democracy’ is the plaything of the elite. It is designed to make sure that the people never get to pry into the affairs of the rich.
Virtually everyone ever elected has been explicitly approved by the Old World Order ………. and is dancing to their tune.
The simplest way to end this farce is to ensure that the Power Elite will no longer be able to harbor any secrets regarding their wealth, tax position, and their social and religious networks. Can anyone seriously claim that this is anti-democratic ?
Which people will resist to the bitter end any attempt to expose the extent of their privileged lifestyle ? the Zionists and the Freemasons …….. the Old World Order. They know that disclosure would provoke astonishment, scandal, moral outrage, resentment, rage and fury amongst the people in equal measures. The people would demand that steps be taken against the elite. Revolution would erupt.
Ask yourself just one question …….. If the Power Elite know this would be the consequence of full disclosure, is that not proof in itself that they know how unjust, immoral and poisonous their privileged position is ? It would cause scandal purely because it is scandalous. They know it and we know it …….. Everyone knows it.
No one should vote for any politician who refuses to campaign for the Annual Wealth Census. Write to your political representatives about it. Demand action. Create online petitions. Blog about it. Create websites. Set up Facebook campaigns. Go on Twitter. Make YouTube videos. Make protest songs.
Make it a worldwide demand that the top 1% of the world’s wealthiest people be subjected to the closest scrutiny and be compelled to reveal all of their financial details and the details of their social networks.
With this one measure, the world would be transformed and a golden age of meritocracy ushered in. The leading meritocrats would understand that they should never be paid ridiculously more than average hard-working men and women of the world. Capitalism ….. the ideology that a tiny elite should be permitted to command the vast bulk of a nation’s wealth – is the Gospel of Satan. No decent, moral political or economic system can permit excessive wealth and power to fall into the hands of a privileged elite.
The Five Meritocratic Principles
1) Itʼs not who your parents are, itʼs who you are.
2) Itʼs not what others can do for you, itʼs what you can do.
3) Sex, race, religion, age, background are irrelevant. Talent is everything.
4) You start from the same point as everyone else, and you go as far as your talents take you.
5) The highest rewards for the highest achievers.
1) To implement the five Meritocratic Principles.
2) To abolish the monarchy since it contradicts the first Meritocratic Principle.
In a monarchy, the only thing that matter is the identity of your parents.
In a meritocracy, your parents are irrelevant.
No meritocrat would seek the ” permission ” of a monarch to govern.
3) To abolish the House of Lords ( House of Cronyism ), which contradicts the
second Meritocratic Principle since it is the product of patronage. In a properly constituted meritocratic system, there is no requirement for a second House.
4) To abolish Party Politics. Political parties are irrelevant in a meritocratic system. Parliament will be populated by independent M.P.s with no set political affiliations.
5) Each independent MP will be selected on the basis of their merit relating to their
field of expertise. So, the Chancellor of the Exchequer is selected from amongst
practicing economists ( and will be elected only by other economists ).
The Secretary of State for Health will be someone who works in the health field
( and is elected only by health workers ).
The Secretary for Defense will be from the armed forces.
The Foreign Secretary a serving official in the Foreign Office.
The Secretary of State for Education a serving teacher / headmaster / lecturer.
In other words, MPs in the House of Commons will not represent a political party or a geographical constituency, but a particular field in which they have demonstrable experience, expertise and merit and their constituents / voters will be people in the same field who can make an informed decision about their ability.
6) The Prime Minister will be elected by the MPs from amongst their number. Every five years, there will be a general election in which every MP has to seek the endorsement of their voters …. or be replaced.
7) To abolish Cabinet Collective Responsibility.
The principle that people should promote views with which they privately disagree is absurd and ipso facto brings politicians into disrepute.
Why havenʼt they resigned if they disagree with a policy ? How can they defend a position that they themselves do not believe in ? If they publicly support a policy they privately reject ….. they are hypocrites.
8) Critiques of government policy will be provided by select committees of MPs. Special committees comprising scientists and philosophers may also be used. They will be chosen because of their critical-thinking abilities and their expertise in challenging assumptions. Committees of artists, entrepreneurs and designers may also be called upon. Pressure groups will be given a prominent voice tales since meritocracy welcomes close scrutiny.
9) To abolish the ” moralizing ” approach to politics.
The politics of principle ….. what is “right” and what is “wrong” will be replaced by The scientific method ” what works and what does not ” the politics of pragmatism.
10) To increase Inheritance Tax to 100%.
No one should be able to posthumously transfer an advantage to another person of their choosing. The state should acquire all of the assets of the deceased and should allocate them on a meritocratic basis.
11) Education is the bedrock of merit.
Education will be accorded the highest importance in the meritocratic state.
The current education system is a demonstrable failure and should be overhauled in every respect. The current education system is designed to produce “shoppers”
( they being what capitalist democracies require to sustain their economic model ) True education is opposite of shopping. It liberates the mind, not the credit card.
12) To promote the ideas of the most radical, free-thinking, independently-minded philosophers. e.g ……. Nietzsche, Baudrillard, Rousseau, Diogenes, Camus, etc.
13) To provide community-based alternatives to the family
( based, for example, on the Kibbutz model ) so that if a family fails, those family members are not cast into the costly and counter-productive hell of state care.
” In Revolution and Reformation how can a people who have struggled long years under oppression throw off their oppressors and establish a free society ? The problems are immense, but their solution lies in the education and enlightenment of the people ”
” Whoever does not close his ear to the lamentations of the miserable, nor his heart to gentle pity, whoever is the friend and brother of the unfortunate, whoever has a heart capable of love and friendship, whoever is steadfast in adversity, unwearied in the carrying out of whatever has been once engaged in, undaunted in the overcoming of difficulties, whoever does not mock and despise the weak, whose soul is susceptible of conceiving great designs, desirous of rising superior to all base motives, and of distinguishing himself by deeds of benevolence. Whoever shuns idleness, whoever considers no knowledge as unessential which he may have the opportunity of acquiring, regarding the knowledge of mankind as his chief study, whoever, when truth and virtue are in question, despising the approbation of the multitude, is sufficiently courageous to follow the dictates of his own heart ….. such a one is a proper candidate.”
Adam Weishaupt, An Improved System of the Illuminati, Gotha. 1787.
END OF CHAPTER IX: NEW WORLD ORDER
666 The Anti Christ