Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  ESOTERIC  >  Current Article

Alexander Romanov’s 666 The Anti Christ (Ch.1) God

By   /  January 1, 2011  /  No Comments

    Print       Email

Alexander Romanov

GNOSTIC ILLUMINATI

666 The Anti Christ

Chapter I: GOD

The Prophets of Truth

Imagine that humanity’s only true religion has been protected by a small, secret group of people for many thousands of years. All the while, other religions have proliferated, proclaiming themselves to be ” the truth ” …… even though they are utterly false, and capturing millions and even billions in their webs of deceit.

Throughout history, all over the world, the adherents of the false religions have relentlessly hunted down the members of the true religion and tried to exterminate them. But the followers of the true religion have grown skilled at concealment.

They have survived every persecution, and have managed to keep recruiting brilliant people ……… including some of the most famous thinkers and artists in history ……….. who have kept the flame alive.

But why has the true religion failed so spectacularly in the face of the false prophets ? Why has the truth struggled to be heard ? Can there be anything more horrific than that billions of souls have perished believing in a message that is, in most cases ……… the opposite of the truth ?

The illuminati is an ancient secret society that seeks to bring about a New World Order based on the principle that everyone has it within them to literally become God. This book will present the Illuminati’s radical vision for a new humanity and provide a full account of the inner divinity of the human race.

The ten most influential Grand Masters of the Illuminati are …….. King Solomon the Apostate, Pythagoras, Heraclitus, Empedocles, Simon Magus, Hypatia, Leibniz, Weishaupt, Goethe … and Hegel.

The illuminati are a radical and indeed revolutionary organization who seek nothing less that to assist the ordinary men and women of the human race to ascend to the next stage of humanity’s divine evolution. This higher level is described as the ” Community of Gods ” or the ” Society of the Divine.”

The aim, as it has always been, is to overthrow the network of elite, dynastic families of wealth and privilege who are referred to as the ” Old World Order “.

They have run this world since the dawn of civilization …. to their maximum advantage and to the extreme detriment of the people.

It is time to end the reign of the false prophets, the fake gods and tawdry idols that are called ” celebrities “. Humanity has had enough of bankers and traders, lawyers and accountants, politicians and their ‘special advisers’, lobbyists, spin doctors, agents, gatekeepers, CEOs, chairmen, advertisers and marketing men.

Enough of all the same faces of the ” top ” with their relentless tricks and tactics to keep enriching themselves ………….. at the expense of the ordinary people.

Enough of George Bush’s ” Freedumb and Dumbocracy ” that cons people into voting for the rich and the apologists for the rich, and enough of the Abrahamic religions which keep billions of people on their knees as slaves to a tyrant ….. masquerading as God.

illumination is not a religion for those who wish to debase themselves before a debased God. No God would tolerate kneeling and bowing masses, murmuring hordes of obedient, frightened slaves. Is God your friend or a tyrant ? Why would you kneel to a friend ? Would a friend ever ask that of you ? Humanity can not be free until it recognizes its relationship to divinity, it is not one of ‘master and slave’.

If you venture into a church, a mosque or synagogue, be in no doubt that you are amongst slaves and that they worship a God who is their absolute master. They are abject before him. Such a God is drunk on his own power and vanity. He craves obedience. He despises those who think for themselves.

Such a God is no God at all ….. Such a God …. is Satan.

***************************************************

Alienation

The central crisis of humanity lies in the concept of alienation. Humans are alienated from their jobs, their neighbors, their communities, their culture, their society, their political leaders. They feel powerless, unable to change anything.

They find themselves depersonalized in the large, bureaucratic machines for which

they work. They are not recognized as individuals with unique worth. They are cast adrift, estranged, full of anxiety. The world seems foreign, alien and hostile. Above all, people are alienated from themselves. Their alienation is most extreme in the case of what ought to be their greatest inspiration …… religion.

When a person bows to “ God ” he shows that he understands nothing of God.

God is your guide …. your light ….. your exemplar.
He is your friend … your partner … ally … and mentor. He is like a perfect big brother, steering you through life.

If your big brother asked you to bow before him and pray to him ….. you would think he had gone insane.

If he demanded you to worship him …. you would hate him.
If he commanded you to love, serve and obey him ….. you would fight him.

His job is to nurture you and bring out the best in you …. not make you his slave.

If a person prays to a God whom he considers omnipotent, omniscient, and perfect in every way, it is inevitable that he will see himself by contrast as flawed, ignorant, powerless and sinful.

He will have stripped himself of his own nobility and worth and projected it onto this remote, inhuman God, so far above the level of humanity as to be unknowable and unreachable.

A person on his knees to this God is …..
profoundly unhappy ….. wracked with self-loathing.

He has created a means to torture himself.
Whenever he contemplates this God ….. he cannot help simultaneously contemplating how far he falls short ….. he sees himself as despicable.

Does such a person have a healthy attitude to life ?
Is he contented, optimistic, self-confident, eager to take on
every challenge life throws at him ? Or is he mired in negativity ?

He canʼt save himself, he thinks ….. only God can save him. His is an Alienated Soul.

Now imagine that this person realizes that God is not external but internal. All the qualities he so admires and reveres in God are actually within him. Deeply buried within him no doubt ……… but within him nonetheless.

If he can get in touch with his inner divinity …….. his life will be transformed. Instead of crawling around the world on his hands and knees, terrified of his infinitely distant perfect God, he will stride around confidently and powerfully

……… a God in his own right. A majestic human being. A credit to humanity.

He will experience the ecstasy of self-actualization and self-realization. His alienation from himself will be at an end.

The great illuminist Hegel highlighted several lines from the Book of Genesis to illustrate manʼs plight ……

“ God ” said to Abraham ………. “ Get thee out of thy country, from thy kindred, and from thy fatherʼs house, unto a land that I will show thee.”

Hegel wrote …. “ With his herds Abraham wandered hither and thither over a boundless territory without bringing parts of it nearer to him by cultivating and improving them …. he was a stranger to soil and men alike …. The whole world Abraham regarded his opposite, if he did not take it to be a nullity he looked upon it as sustained by a God who was alien to it. Nothing in nature was supposed to have any part in God, everything was simply under Godʼs mastery.”

This captures the sense of humans being strangers in a strange land, alienated from the world they inhabit, estranged from themselves, in thrall to an inhuman God. Abraham, from whom the Satanic religions of Christianity, Judaism and Islam trace their common descent …. is the very essence of the Alienated Soul.

He was the first of the false prophets. His “ God ” is Satan. It is Satan who wants humanity to see itself as separated from divinity by an infinite, unbridgeable gulf.

illumination, the religion that has always opposed Satan, preaches the precise reverse. The gap between humanity and God is illusory. The divine spark is within us all. If we can overcome the Satanic lies and propaganda designed to keep us alienated from our inner divinity, we can make a heaven of this Satanic world.

Christianity, Judaism and Islam – the dark religions of the Devil – are the primary barriers to the light of the True God. He is not without, he is within. Imagine a world populated by billions of people in whom the divine spark has been liberated.

Wouldnʼt you rather live there than the hell-hole we currently inhabit ?

Humanity is capable of so much more.
Is it not time to bring about real change ?
Is it not time to seize our divine inheritance ?

The illuminati are the messengers of the True God.

Their sacred mission is to bring humanity into full union with the True God so that there is no longer any distinction between the human race and the divine essence.

They show precisely how this can be achieved by using …..

Einstein’s theories of special and general relativity and quantum mechanics.

All religions based on faith rather than knowledge are contrary to illumination. All religions that do not teach reincarnation are contrary to illumination.
All religions that posit a benign creator of the earth are contrary to illumination. All religions that place humanity in an automatically degraded state in relation to divine reality are contrary to illumination.

Men and women are not afflicted by ” original sin “.
They are not guilty from the moment they are born as some religions contend. They are not condemned by the sins of others ( e.g. ” Adam and Eve ” ).
They are not subject to Christian predestination.
They are not subject to Karma.

The essence of illumination lies in the word …… ” Becoming “.
Religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam are based on …. ” Being “.

Those who understand the difference between ‘being’ and ‘becoming’ will start to see how illumination offers a radically different worldview, one that is utterly breathtaking in the opportunities it offers to humanity.

It is time for humanity to open its eyes and see the divine light for the first time. Their religion is called illumination, they have emerged from the shadows to cast the light of Abraxas, the True God, on this benighted world and to bring illumination ….. enlightenment …… to everyone.

In the name of truth, justice and freedom the illuminati will soon bring the just, equitable and meritocratic New World Order … that humanity is crying out for.

” It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honors that we are fighting, but for freedom …. for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself. ”

The Declaration of Arbroath, Scotland, 1320

This is the great object held out by this association, and the means of attaining it is illumination, enlightening the understanding by the sun of reason which will dispel the clouds of superstition and of prejudice.

And of all illumination which human reason can give, none is comparable to the discovery of what we are, our nature, our obligations, what happiness we are capable of, and what are the means of attaining it.

Nothing would be more profitable to us than a right history of mankind.

The Ancien Régime is a Satanic Order. The Illuminati’s noble and historic mission is to release man’s higher self by destroying the archons – the princes of the world – who prosecute Satan’s will and hold mankind in their thrall. Their corruption has reached its zenith in France. That diabolical tyranny is ripe for destruction.
All that is required is a spark. We are the spark.

Adam Weishaupt ( Grandmaster of the Illuminati, 1789 )

################################################################

The Big Bang

14 billion years ago there was no physical universe. The only thing that existed was ” God ” – an entirely incorporeal spirit. He was pure thought, Absolute Mind.

After eons of contemplation, God reached an extraordinary decision, he was going to commit suicide, to bring about the most momentous event ever … his own death.

The Death of God. But how does God kill himself ? Isn’t it impossible by definition? How do you kill the eternal, the immortal, the deathless ? how do you kill existence itself ? And after all …… that is exactly what God was ……. existence itself.
And if he was all there was …… what would be left when he was dead ?

God understood that the only true death he could experience would be one of transformation, he would make himself into a new form of existence. He would be reincarnated so to speak. He would no longer be pure mind but would incorporate a revolutionary new substance which he had decided to create ……… MATTER.

Yet matter, because it came from God, would be infused with ” God-ness “.
Every particle of matter, regardless of how humble and seemingly insignificant, would be a spark of God. And all of these sparks would, buried within them, have an irresistible desire to reconstitute God.

God’s infinitely inspired idea was that the ultimate creative act was to create himself. God was going to become God. There could be no more divine deed.

So God, a being who did not exist in physical space, a being who existed outside of space and time, a being of infinite power, of infinite spiritual and intellectual energy, decided to self-detonate ….. to turn that infinite energy of the mind into the infinite physical energy of the universe of matter. He would die …. in order to be reborn.

Eons after his ” death “, all of the physical particles that his death had liberated … the great multitude of ” divine sparks ” … would find a way to bring him back to life in a new form. He would give birth to himself.

God would live, die, be reborn and live again. He would undergo samsara.
He would demonstrate his infinite power, his eternal fearlessness, his infinite intellectual curiosity. He would gain complete and final knowledge of existence.

If he did not kill himself how would he ever know what it was like to die ?
His knowledge would be incomplete. He would be lacking, imperfect. How could he be any judge of mortality if he himself had not undergone the fate of mortals ?

How can you be God if you have never died ? You can only understand death by experiencing it. How could God understand doubt if he had never experienced that either ? By killing himself there was an outside chance that he might never come back to life in his former glory, there would be an inescapable element of doubt.

All sorts of things that God would never understand otherwise would become known to him if he killed himself. It was the only way to attain self-knowledge. To attain the perfection demanded of God. So, the moment of creation came.

14 billion years ago, God said …… ” Let there be Life “.

**********************************

r >= 0

But how to explain this event in terms of modern day science and physics ? The answer to that ultimate of questions is found by looking at a Black Hole.

A Black Hole is an object whose gravity is so strong that not even light can escape from its gravitational pull. It is the most mysterious object in the universe and holds the key to understanding the nature of reality and the fundamental composition of the universe.

Their hypothetical existence was first predicted in Einstein’s famous Theory of General Relativity, but Einstein himself believed it was impossible for them to become real objects in the universe. The reason for that is that they exhibit a feature that physics cannot cope with ….. or comprehend.

Einstein’s equations contain a term that involves dividing the mass of a black hole by the distance ” r ” from the black hole. The question is what happens when r = 0 ?

Division by zero gives a result of infinity. To physicists … it is impossible for infinity

to appear in the real world, so they consider r = 0 to be the point at which physics breaks down. At r = 0 ( the centre of a black hole ) gravity is infinite and time itself stops …….. all of the mass of the black hole is contained within an infinitely small point where the concept of space no longer makes any sense. This point takes up precisely no space at all. Since it is outside of space and time, it is dimensionless.

The physical universe collapses into an ineffable twilight state at this point. This apparently impossible object of infinite density and infinite gravity is known as the Singularity. No predictions can be made about it, or about what might emerge from it. At the singularity, physicists’ understanding of nature totally fails. Therefore, they believe there is a flaw with the formulation of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity …… despite its immense success.

The one thing no physicist has ever contemplated is this …. that there is no flaw whatsoever. The reason why physics seems to disintegrate at r = 0 is for the very simple reason that r = 0 is not in the physical universe. It is in the mental universe, the universe of the mind, the place where our thoughts, memories and dreams reside, it is the place of God, and we are connected to that place via our soul.

Physicists, who are so blindly and irrationally wedded to materialism, have never taken their own equations to their logical conclusion. What their equations actually point to at the limit of r = 0 is a different aspect of existence, it is mental rather than physical, dimensionless rather than dimensional … it is outside of space and time.

Rather than face up to that fact, physicists would prefer to futilely search for a new theory …. but they have nowhere to go. They will always run up against exactly the same problem … that the universe of dimensions, of space and time, coexists with another universe of no dimensions ….. outside of space and time.

Reality can never be comprehended if either aspect is ignored.

To talk about ” two universes ” however is convenient but technically incorrect.

The true nature of existence is that it has two aspects coexisting in one continuum.

The r = 0 ( dimensionless, mental ) universe and the r > 0 ( dimensional, physical ) universe are both part of a single universe r >= 0 ( r is greater than and equal to 0 ).

If you want an equation for everything …. you could choose r >= 0 because that encapsulates the true dual nature of reality …. both the physical and the mental.

There is a black hole at the centre of every galaxy. At the centre of our galaxy is one that is 4 million times more massive than our sun. Such black holes are called supermassive. They are essential for galaxy formation ….. and hence for life itself.

Black holes shape the evolution of the universe. They are everywhere in the

universe, millions upon millions of them, and in every place where they occur Einstein’s equations catastrophically fail ( as far as physicists are concerned ).

Black holes are real objects in outer space that lie beyond current scientific understanding. A new theory beyond Einstein is required. That theory already exists …… it is that of the Illuminati, it is that of the r = 0 universe, the ” within ” of things, the inner aspect, the dimensionless reality that science chooses to ignore even though their equations point directly to it.

************************************

Quantum Mechanics

Einstein’s General Relativity is one of the two most successful scientific theories of all time …….. the other being Quantum Mechanics. General Relativity provides a stunningly accurate account of how gravity dictates the motions of planets, stars and galaxies ( the universe of the very large and very fast ), but it cannot describe the universe of the very small ( atoms and subatomic particles ) from which all the planets, stars and galaxies are constructed.

Here, the effects of gravity on these hyper-small, hyper-light entities are negligible.

Physicists dream of combining these two astonishingly successful theories into one grand unified theory that describes everything from the smallest scale to the largest, from the slowest speeds to the fastest. At the moment, each theory is incomplete as a full description of reality …. but a combination might offer completeness.

The two theories meet head-on at one place …. black holes. A black hole is a macroscopic entity associated with enormous amounts of mass and gravity, yet the singularity at the centre of the black hole is exactly of the hyper-microscopic scale of the quantum world.

To fully account for what goes on in inside a black hole at the mysterious singularity ……. quantum mechanics is essential.

When it comes to the quantum world, these statement are typically made ….. a) The act of observing changes what you see.

b) It is impossible to exactly specify where something is, you can only state where it is likely to be.

c) Anything that is possible, no matter how improbable, happens all the time,
and gives rise to measurable phenomena. A good example is the phenomenon of quantum tunneling whereby if you place a particle in a box and lock the box, there is a tiny but finite chance that you will subsequently find the particle outside the box i.e. it has apparently tunneled its way through a solid object.
In the case of the particles being electrons, you can find electrical
phenomena occurring in seemingly impossible places.

d) Particles can literally be in many different places at the same time.
Our whole common sense view of the world vanishes at the quantum level.
All of our most treasured notions of how things behave change beyond recognition.

Quantum mechanics is routinely described as the best idea in physics. It has furnished the most successful predictions ever made by any theory. Everything is ultimately composed of quantum particles, and quantum mechanics comes closer than anything else to describing the true nature of reality.

But it doesn’t incorporate gravity, the universal force that holds everything together. Without gravity, the sun would explode and the earth would disintegrate. Gravity is the universal binding force. It is caused, according to General Relativity …… by the bending of space and time by massive objects.

The effect of gravity on quantum-scale particles is usually negligible, but when it comes to black holes we are dealing with quantum-scale particles ( singularities ) and the most enormous gravitational effects conceivable.

The singularity that exists at the centre of a black hole is both infinitesimally small and astronomically massive. Hence black holes are the key to understanding the universe …… for combining general relativity and quantum mechanics.

Physicists now want to extend quantum mechanics by introducing gravitational effects. This new theory is referred to as ” quantum gravity “. In effect ….. it is a quantum version of Einstein’s general relativity. The problem is that the two theories have proved incompatible. They simply don’t talk to each other.

Whereas black holes generate an infinity caused by division by zero, in quantum gravity an infinity of infinities is generated, the problem becomes infinitely worse.

The only entity comparable to black holes is the singularity that gave birth to the Big Bang itself. Here, too ……… scientific understanding collapses.

The Big Bang is conceived of as a dimensionless point in nothingness from which the whole of the observable physical, dimensional universe of time and space miraculously emerged some 14 billion years ago. To get an idea of how much matter has emerged from “nothing” consider that the sun is a million times more massive than the earth. Our galaxy has a million million stars like our sun.

The observable universe has a million million galaxies like ours. All of this material, together with vast numbers of black holes and “dark matter” all, supposedly …….. came from absolutely nothing.

All of it spewed out of the primordial singularity, a dimensionless point that
gave birth to the biggest explosion of all time. It was the event, so we are told, that created space and time themselves, and some physicists contend that it is absurd to speculate about space and time before then because they did not exist.

So, we are all the progeny of the mother of all singularities. We all came out of a dimensionless point. We are the children of nothingness, the products of nothing. Or so says science.

If science can solve the mysteries of the black hole by understanding the complete nature of a singularity then it should also be able to answer the question of how the universe began and where we all came from. And perhaps the other “big” question can be answered ….. what was there before the universe existed ?

There are two numbers that have proved an insurmountable problem to science, two numbers that provide the limits of existence, zero and infinity.

Infinity is a number without limit, while zero is an anti-number that doesn’t count anything ( for example we can point to three apples, but not to zero apples ). Zero and infinity are two of the most obscure topics in mathematics and, because of their mysterious nature, both arrived on the scene much later than ordinary numbers such as 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. It wasn’t until Georg Cantor’s work of the late nineteenth century that infinity became a respectable subject of study.

Moreover, zero is simply the inverse of infinity …… and vice versa …..
one divided by infinity = zero ……… and one divided by zero = infinity. Science will never be complete until it can fully incorporate zero and infinity.

Rene Descartes who is dubbed the ” father of modern philosophy ” famously divided the universe into two incompatible substances …….

1. matter ( extended substance, having dimensions and capable of being divided ) 2. mind ( thinking substance, having no dimensions and therefore not capable of being physically divided ).

This dualistic description of reality has, in one way or another, dominated human thinking ever since. The insurmountable problem it presents is how matter and mind can interact if they are entirely separate substances. For that reason, science has denied the existence of the mental universe and become entirely materialistic, contending that “mind” is some mysterious by-product of the physical world. But no scientist has ever come close to explaining how consciousness arises from atoms.

To use a slightly different terminology for Descartes’ proposal about the nature of reality. What he calls extended substance, lets call ” dimensional substance “. and what he calls thinking substance, lets call ….. ” dimensionless substance “.

Is there some obvious reason why it is legitimate for scientists and materialists to dispose of the possibility of dimensionless substance ? On the face of it … the only thing we can be sure of is thinking, which most people regard as non-materialistic.

Conversely, is there some obvious reason why idealist thinkers should dispose of dimensional substance and deny the existence of the material world ? On the face of it, everyone takes the existence of the material world for granted. It seems utterly undeniable. We are left in a hopeless standoff …… How do we proceed ?

This is where dialectical logic plays a decisive role. The dialectical approach treats dimensional substance as the thesis and dimensionless substance as the antithesis and then combines the two into a higher synthesis.

Thesis ……….. dimensional substance
Antithesis ……. dimensionless substance
Synthesis ……. dimensional / dimensionless substance

In effect we replace Descartes’ two separate, incompatible substances with a single substance that has two dialectical aspects ………. dimensional and dimensionless.

The problem of how to make two different substances interact is thus overcome because now there is only one substance but with two aspects …. physical and mental, dimensional and dimensionless, which perpetually interact dialectically.

Science is the theory that only Descartes’ ” extended ” substance exists
i.e. things must have dimensions before they can be ” real “. Illumination is the doctrine that ” things ” without dimensions are as real as those with dimensions. To express it mathematically, r = 0 is as real as r > 0. Science has no legitimate basis for excluding r = 0, and, indeed, r = 0 appears right at the heart of science, right at the centre of the Genesis Singularity, the Big Bang itself.

Science says the Big Bang arose out of nothingness
( an impossible and non-existent state ) while Illumination teaches that the physical universe of dimensions ( r > 0 ) emerged not from ” nowhere and nothing ” but from the mental, dimensionless universe ( r = 0 ).

Something did not come from nothing but from a different aspect of something … matter from mind, dimensions from non-dimensions. Equally, dimensional matter

can be transformed into dimensionless mind, and this is the process which takes place at a black hole singularity where r = 0.

Which paradigm is the more logical and consistent ?
Which does not require something to spontaneously arise from nothing ?

Scientists have never asked themselves the most basic question of all …. why should dimensional entities ( r > 0 ) be privileged over non-dimensional entities ( r = 0 ) ? What is the sufficient reason for existence to exclude dimensionless entities and be wholly based on dimensional entities ?

There is no such reason. It is blind, irrational prejudice that causes scientists to ignore the r = 0 universe. They suffer from ” group think “.

Any scientist who dared to suggest that the r = 0 dimensionless aspect of existence was as real as the r > 0 dimensional aspect would be ridiculed by his peers. This is the danger of institutionalized thinking. It breeds fear …. it prevents the most radical ideas from being contemplated, unless such ideas conform to the ruling paradigm.

Yet no scientist can provide any legitimate scientific or philosophical reason why dimensionless existence is not every bit as real as dimensional existence and, indeed, the Big Bang singularity itself is a dimensionless entity, as is the singularity at the centre of any black hole.

Why don’t scientists face the facts provided by their own most cherished theories ? Dimensionless entities can, do and must exist.

***************************************************

Bellʼs Theorem

Most people have never heard of ” Bellʼs theorem “, but there is scarcely a more dramatic and far-reaching postulate. Physicist Henry Stapp described it as the most profound theorem in science and said “ The important thing about Bellʼs theorem is that it puts the dilemma posed by quantum phenomena clearly into the realm of macroscopic phenomena … [it] shows that our ordinary ideas about the world are somehow profoundly deficient, even on the macroscopic level.”

Bell’s theorem was prompted by a famous paradox put forward by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen to challenge the prevailing interpretation of quantum mechanical ” reality “. The EPR paradox concerns a phenomenon known as

quantum entanglement involving pairs of correlated particles. If the first particle
in a pair has a certain property – spin, for example – that can be described as “up” then the other paired particle must have the opposite spin property – “down” – so that the two spins cancel to zero.
( If they didn’t, spin asymmetry would emerge, leading to an unbalanced universe. )

According to classical physics, the two particles have opposite spin states from the outset. However, quantum theory says that each particle exists in a superposition of the up and down spin states ( i.e. neither has a clear-cut spin state ), and it is not until a measurement is carried out and the spin wave-function ” collapses ” that a particle can be said to have a definite spin state. This instantaneously causes the spin wave-function of the other particle to collapse into the opposite state.

The EPR paradox relates to what happens if the two particles are separated by
an enormous distance where no instantaneous communication between the two particles is possible within the framework of conventional physics. If one particle is measured to be ” up “, how, in quantum theory, can the other particle then ” know ” that its spin wave-function should collapse into the ” down ” state ? Classically, each particle always had a definite spin, so there’s no dilemma in this view.

Quantum mechanically, neither particle knew what its spin state was until a measurement took place. But the question is how can the other particle know the outcome of the measurement instantaneously if it is, say, a light year away ? What mechanism would be used to communicate the information ? The EPR paradox seemed to strike a deadly blow at quantum mechanical orthodoxy.

It required either ” action at a distance ” ( this is the interaction of two objects which are separated in space with no known mediator of the interaction ), or faster than light communication. Einstein completely rejected the latter and said of the former, ” Physics should represent a reality in time and space, free from spooky actions at a distance.” He introduced a locality principle which stated ……

” If two systems are in isolation from each other for some time, then a measurement of the first can produce no real change on the second.”

Einstein and his colleagues believed that they had shown that quantum theory was incomplete and that hidden variables ( well-defined classical elements of reality not yet revealed ) must exist.

The defenders of orthodox quantum mechanics maintained that the entangled particles are part of a single system, and it doesn’t matter by how far the particles are separated …….. once connected they can never be truly separated.

It was to this fundamental issue that Bell turned his attention. An introduction to Bell’s theorem can be found in this article ….

http://www.quantiki.org/wiki/index.php/Bell’s_theorem#Statement_of_Bell. 27s_theorem

The article says :

” In its simplest form, Bell’s theorem states ….

No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics.

[ Bell ] showed that the assumption of local realism – that particle attributes have definite values independent of the act of observation and that physical effects have a finite propagation speed – leads to a requirement for certain types of phenomena which is not present in quantum mechanics. This requirement is called ‘ Bell’s inequality ‘. Similar inequalities have subsequently been derived by different authors which are collectively termed ‘ Bell inequalities ‘. They all make the same assumptions about local realism – that a quantum-level object has a well-defined state which accounts for all its measurable properties and that distant objects do not exchange information faster than the speed of light. These well defined properties are often called hidden variables.”

Bell’s theorem was tested and confirmed by Alain Aspect’s team in Paris in 1982.

Bell’s theorem decisively rejects Einstein’s view of reality. Nature has non-local aspects.

The ramifications are astounding. Even though the world appears to be based on locality, it is in fact based on an unmediated, unseen reality that permits faster than light ( and probably instantaneous ) communication. Any credible theory of reality must be able to satisfy Bell’s theorem.

David Bohm, a supporter of Einstein’s views, proposed that the universe is actually something akin to a giant hologram. A true hologram ( rather than the type that gets placed on credit cards ) has the property of non-locality ……… every part of a piece of holographic film contains all of the information possessed by the whole film. Karl Pribram has suggested that human memory is based on holographic principles. In fact, his theory involves the whole human brain operating according to holographic rules. This theory could potentially explain why people can recover a huge amount of normal brain function even after suffering major brain damage or even the surgical removal of large portions of the brain.

The hologram theory is extremely controversial and has been dismissed by most scientists. More controversial is Rupert Sheldrake’s theory of Morphic Resonance. According to Sheldrake, information can be transmitted instantaneously without loss of energy through any amount of time and space via ” morphogenetic fields.”

Some people have speculated that particles called tachyons exist. These are superluminal particles, they travel faster than light. Such particles are consistent with Einstein’s theory of relativity ( no particle can be accelerated from below the speed of light to faster than the speed of light but since tachyons can never travel

more slowly than the speed of light, this rule does not apply to them ). If tachyons exist, then they travel backwards in time. Although tachyons are theoretically interesting, no evidence for their existence has ever been found.

Illumination has no difficulty in conforming to the requirements of Bell’s theorem. Illumination teaches that mind and matter are two aspects of the same substance. This single substance exists in both a dimensional and non-dimensional space. The matter aspect is confined to the dimensional space while the mind aspect is confined to the non-dimensional space. The non-dimensional space can be considered along the lines of the ” singularity ” that is said to exist at the

centre of a black hole, or the singularity associated with the Big Bang.

In black hole theory, the singularity of a non-spinning black hole is a dimensionless point of infinite density ( which distorts time and space so much that nothing, not even light, can escape from its gravitational field ). It has zero radius, zero volume, and the laws of physics break down completely at this point.

The dimensionless singularity of Illumination also has zero radius and zero volume, but rather than being associated with infinite density, it is associated with infinite mental events. It has no connection with space and time ( which are part of the dimensional universe ).

Everything in the universe can be explained by the co-existence of the mental and material aspects in an all-pervasive single substance, and by the co-existence of a dimensional universe and a non-dimensional universe.

Illumination provides a straightforward answer to the EPR paradox.
The pair of entangled particles start off together in the dimensional material universe, and also in the zero-dimensional mental universe. While they can be separated in the physical universe, they cannot be separated in the dimensionless mental universe. No matter how far apart they travel in physical space, they are permanently connected via the mental universe. So, as soon as a measurement
is carried out on one, the outcome is immediately reflected in the mental universe, and that result is in turn immediately reflected in the paired particle, again in the mental universe. But as soon as the results of the measurement are ” known ” in the mental universe they are instantaneously reflected in the physical universe. Hence, the behavior required by Bell’s theorem is comprehensively explained.

The fundamental point is that by uniting the material and the mental, by uniting a universe with dimensions with one without dimensions ……. all of the problems of Descartes’ dualistic universe are solved, all the paradoxes of quantum mechanics are solved, the appearance of mind from non-mind and of life from non-life no longer have to be explained since every material object is ” minded ” and to that extent alive. Instantaneous communications are no longer baffling.

All instantaneous links are mediated by the mental singularity …… that lies at the core of physical existence.

The laws of science relate, overwhelmingly, to the physical universe. The EPR paradox and Bell’s theorem give the first scientific glimpse of the interface between mind and matter. In the future, a new science of this extraordinary interface will

emerge. In the far future, physics ( the science of the dimensional universe ) and metaphysics ( the science of the dimensionless universe ) will be seen as one.
( Illumination prefers the term “transcendental physics” rather than “metaphysics” )

In one mind – that of God – physics and transcendental physics are already one.

The implications of the mind-matter, dimensional-dimensionless universe are extraordinary. The door is opened to psychic powers and what is commonly referred to as the ” paranormal “. Such powers are mediated by the dimensionless mental singularity where time and space do not exist and everything is, in a sense, connected and one.

The Illuminati refer to the dimensional universe of matter as the Hylocosmos
( hyle = matter ) and the dimensionless universe of mind – the mental singularity – as the Psychocosmos ( psyche = mind ). Only a reality with these two aspects can account for the nature of our knowledge and experiences. Reality is a superposition of the mental and physical, of the dimensional and dimensionless.

Time, space and causation arise in the Hylocosmos, and from there are reflected in the Psychocosmos, but time, space and causation are not inherent in the Psychocosmos. Time and space support the ” principium individuationis “
….. the principle of individuation.

What distinguishes one individual thing from another is that they are differently located in time and space. Anything that existed in exactly the same time and space, and with the same properties, as another thing would not be different from that thing. Because things exist individually in the Hylocosmos, this is reflected in the Psychocosmos, but individual things are not inherent in the Psychocosmos.

Quantum physicists will rightly point out that, as a consequence of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, it is impossible to tell whether two quantum particles of the same type are located in the same space. This could be interpreted as evidence that the Psychocosmos shapes the Hylocosmos at the elementary level, blurring the principle of individuation.

The lack of intrinsic qualities of time, space and individuation in the Psychocosmos is what underlies, in religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism, the notion of an underlying universal oneness, wholeness and togetherness. These religions treat the Hylocosmos as an illusion or place where we misapprehend the real nature of things ( the veil of Maya in Hinduism ) and see the Psychocosmos as true reality.

These religions regard ego, separation, difference, individuation as entities that need to be overcome on the journey towards universal union. Human suffering arises, they claim, from our inability to perceive the true interconnectedness of all things. ” Enlightenment ” in these religions amounts to escaping the Hylocosmos and fully entering the Psychocosmos.

Illumination, while it has certain elements in common with Hinduism and Buddhism, is ultimately fundamentally different and teaches radically different truths. For one thing, the Hylocosmos and Psychocosmos are inextricably linked

and neither is more ” true ” than the other. They exist only in relation to each other. The Psychocosmos – as the arena of thought and moral action – is rightly the focus of all religions, but it cannot do without the Hylocosmos.

Whereas Hinduism and Buddhism both seek, ultimately, the abolition of the self, illumination centers on the transition of the self from its most primitive form to the maximum expression of itself, the fullest realization of its potential – the Self with
a capital ” S “. It seeks, in short, not to absorb the individual into some universal oneness …….. but to make the individual as perfect as possible ……… Godlike. The Psychocosmos is the arena where individuals can become everything they have it within themselves to be and not a place where individuality is extinguished.

There is a higher truth that Hindus and Buddhists completely miss. It derives from the well-known concept that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts ( this is a concept known as holism ). Human bodies are made up of many individual cells, but the whole – humans themselves – are vastly more than mere collections of cells.

A whole that contains no parts is intrinsically inferior to a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. The latter contains an entire extra element missing in the former. Individuation is critical to the creation of the greatest conceivable whole.

Far from being extinguished in “nirvana” individuation has to be maximized so that the whole, comprised of all the optimized individual things, will itself be optimized. The destruction of the individual in Hinduism and Buddhism is anathema to Illumination.

Arthur Koestler introduced the term “holon” ( from the Greek word “holos” meaning whole ) to describe an entity functioning as both a whole and as a part of a whole, to be independent in one function, and dependent in the other. Koestler referred to the “Janus principle” to describe the dual nature of holons. Holons strive to be both whole and to belong to a whole. This is extremely close to the ancient teaching of illumination. Only individuals who are whole can be part of a divine whole. The journey of each individual, over a number of incarnations, is to allow him to learn the lessons that will permit him to become whole, and be part of a greater whole.

The illuminati teach the message of the Double Holos – a perfect, whole individual within a perfect, whole community. Those who cannot learn that lesson are rejected from the divine whole. They are the damned. Hell is that place where the whole is less than the sum of its parts, where the damned are locked in selfishness, egotism, refusal to cooperate, cruelty, vanity, greed and division. It does not take much to see that hell closely resembles this earth of ours, ruled by the Old World Order.

This hell can be transformed into the first step to heaven ……………. but the Old World Order must be destroyed before we can begin to climb the ladder.

Philosophically, the concepts of subject and object are of fundamental importance.

The subject is that which knows or experiences while the object is that which is known or experienced. All things are objects in the Hylocosmos and subjects in the Psychocosmos. There is no such thing as a subject without an object or an object

without a subject. This is the most remarkable feature of existence, that everything is both object and subject. Most things do not have sufficiently developed minds to take advantage of that, but humans do. We can see our bodies as physical objects in the Hylocosmos, yet our primary way of relating to physical reality is as subjects.

Yet even with humans, there is a vast grey area and it relates to what is commonly known as the ” unconscious “. Illumination uses a different terminology for this concept. Illumination asserts that all animals are sentient beings and to that extent are conscious. Humans are the only animals on earth that have the higher level of consciousness labelled ” self-consciousness “, the ability to reflect upon their own existence.

If a human could remove his self-consciousness, he would exist at the same level of consciousness as animals. What Freud refers to as unconsciousness is what is, really, the consciousness of non-human animals.

A sleepwalking human is not self-conscious, but can nevertheless carry out complicated tasks. He is not unconscious, he is using animal consciousness rather than human self-consciousness. At this level of consciousness, humans are more like objects than subjects. Despite what humans think, much of their activity actually takes place at this level, hence the success of Freud’s theory of the unconscious.

Freud revealed that a huge amount of what we do derives from our objective rather than our subjective nature. Our subjective nature then has to rationalize why we behaved in that way. Some people are far better at that task than others.

Many humans exist as little more than higher-functioning animals, while
a few have the capacity to successfully operate as lower-functioning gods.

Which would you prefer to be ?

Dreams and physical reality

People who have lost their sight do not have blind dreams … they dream as though they still had their vision. But someone who has never had sight could never experience a sighted dream. What does that prove ? The mental needs the physical to provide experiences, but once it has had sufficient experience of the physical world, it no longer needs it.

In the Psychocosmos, the man who has lost his sight, regains it in the Hylocosmos. Already … we see the glimmer of how it can be that the mental can reach a certain stage when it is no longer so dependent upon the physical. Those who have lost limbs or become paralyzed dream as though they still had their limbs or were free of paralysis. The old can dream of being young again. The living can dream of the dead, and those dead relatives, friends and lovers can come back as vividly as they were when they were alive.

A skeptic might begin to see how souls are possible.

Dreams, so mysterious and difficult to study, are underestimated in our culture. They are so powerful that humans have to be paralyzed during the dream phase of sleep to stop them acting out their dreams, to stop the dreams spilling into physical reality.

The implication is that the margin between reality and dreaming is so slender that if the dream paralysis were removed, we could barely distinguish between the two states. Without dream paralysis, our dreams would have a direct impact on the physical world ……. They would no longer be dreams but reality.

In lucid dreaming, the dreamer can be fully aware that he is dreaming and direct the way the dream develops. The boundary between reality and dream is blurred.

As the Chinese philosopher Chuang-Tzu said after dreaming he was a butterfly

” Who am I in reality, a butterfly dreaming that I am Chuang-Tzu ………….. or Chuang-Tzu dreaming that he is a butterfly ? ”

If the whole human race could have a sufficiently powerful dream
– a collective dream in which everyone was participating in the same dream – could it be distinguished from reality ? The simulated world shown in the film ” The Matrix ” was a common dream supplied to the entire human race, and it successfully replaced ” reality “.

If humanity could at some point evolve a ” Mass Mind “, could it also evolve a collective dream and create its own Matrix ? Could it design heaven for humanity ?

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s concept of the noosphere amounts to a human collective consciousness. He saw the noosphere as evolving towards the
” Omega Point ” the ultimate goal of history, the culmination of consciousness.

Out-of-body Experiences

Out-of-body experiences, near-death experiences and astral projection are all supported by anecdotal evidence but have no scientific support. How could a consciousness separate itself from the body in order to have such experiences ?

If there are no physical eyes, how is it possible to see ? Yet a blind man can “see” in his dreams. But ultimately his vision comes from memory. There is no recorded case of a people blind from birth having an out-of-body experience or near-death experience in which they experienced vision. In fact, even if they could see, they would not know what they were seeing. Seeing is something that is learned. People who recover sight after losing it for decades have to relearn how to see.

Yet, if a single case of an out-of-body experience or near-death-experience could be cited that demonstrated that someone had seen without the use of physical eyes ……. it would instantly be the strongest possible evidence for the existence of souls.

There are now operating theaters in the world where coded messages have been placed on top of theatre equipment so that they are visible to anyone ” hovering ” above an operating table as part of a near-death-experience. No coded message has ever been reported by anyone claiming to have a near-death-experience.

Yet, what if that proof existed, but hadn’t been placed in the public arena ? What if a secret society had already performed out-of-body experiments where coded information was successfully retrieved ?

****************************

The Genesis Point

Consider the Big Bang singularity …… it is fully consistent with all available scientific knowledge to assert that the universe was once in a state of absolute dimensionless ( mental ) energy. There was no dimensional ( physical ) energy whatsoever. The whole of dimensional existence spewed out of a dimensionless singularity, no Big Bang scientist could dispute this. This ‘ fact ‘ by itself reveals that no matter what entropic state the dimensional universe reached, it would always be possible for a singularity to spew out new dimensional energy in a form that could do useful work. Black holes reveal the opposite process, dimensional energy

being converted into dimensionless energy at the black hole singularity. So, QED …… the universe is indeed a perpetual motion machine.

Physicist Paul Davies says …. ” [ Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle ] states, roughly speaking, that all physical quantities are intrinsically a bit uncertain and can undergo rapid spontaneous fluctuations. For example, energy can suddenly appear from nowhere in empty space so long as it fades away again quickly. By briefly ” borrowing ” energy out of the blue, a subatomic particle can, for example, leap out of a trap – a process that underlies the phenomenon of alpha radioactivity. The Heisenberg principle is a rule for payback on the energy loan, the shorter the loan, the more the energy on offer.”

Look at the statements ….

1) “…… energy can suddenly appear from nowhere in empty space so long as it fades away again quickly.”

And 2) ” By briefly ‘ borrowing ‘ energy out of the blue…”

Does this sound like science or mumbo jumbo and hocus pocus ?

In our version of reality, we would say …..

1) ” …… dimensionless energy can be transformed into dimensional
energy and back again, and that process can occur over brief durations
on a hyper-microscopic scale or over much longer time scales on a macroscopic scale ……. ( as in the case of big bang and black hole singularities ).
There is no question of anything appearing from nowhere in empty space.”

And 2) ” Processes requiring dimensional energy are able to tap into an infinite reservoir of dimensionless energy on a hyper-microscopic scale and use if for a brief duration, there is no question of anything being miraculously borrowed out

of the blue ….. ”

Which version do you think sounds more plausible …. more like real science ?

Heisenberg’s famous uncertainty relations are a mathematical description
of the interaction between the r > 0 universe ( within space and time ) and the r = 0 universe ( outside space and time ). They are nothing to do with particles and energy popping into existence ” out of the blue ” ( whatever that means ), ” out of thin air “, ” out of the future “, ” out of the past “, ” out of nothing ” or anything else that scientists fancifully say to explain phenomena for which they have no viable conceptual model.

There is nothing ” spooky ” going on. There is just dimensional and dimensionless energy existing in an existential continuum.

In mathematics, a perfect point is zero-dimensional ( i.e. dimensionless ).
It has no height, width or length, a straight line has one dimension ( length ), a square has two dimensions ( length and breadth ), and a cube has three dimensions ( length, breadth and height ).

Our world comprises objects that are spatially extended in three dimensions, and that has led scientists to conclude that the whole of reality is dimensional. They have forgotten where it all begins ………… the point with no dimensions.

The point is at the origin of all things. All dimensional objects can, finally,
be reduced to a dimensional point. This is a fundamental tenet of illuminism.

The whole of the dimensional universe located in space and time
is accessible from a dimensionless point outside of space and time.

Any point that is not in space and time cannot be said to be located anywhere since that would give it a defined position in space, which would be a contradiction. Thus ….. a point outside of space and time is in a sense everywhere and nowhere.

As the Illuminist Empedocles said …..

” God is a circle whose centre is everywhere, and its circumference nowhere.”

END OF CHAPTER 1 ‘GOD’

666 The Anti Christ

Alexander Romanov

    Print       Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also like...

On the Source of Authority -Salinas

Read More →